ЗАМОРАЖИВАНИЕ ЭМБРИОНОВ КРУПНОГО РОГАТОГО СКОТА ПОЛУЧЕННЫХ IN VITRO
Аннотация
calves, it is established that such embryos are much more sensitive to freezing than in vivo-derived embryos.
Pregnancy rates such embryos are generally lower than those reported for in vivo-derived. There are many
well-documented differences at the morphological, ultrastructural, metabolic, biochemical level between
the two categories of embryos. Chilling of in vitro derived bovine embryos depends on their developmental
stage, culture conditions and on presence of numerous lipid droplets in their cytoplasm
Список литературы
1. Holm P., Callesen H.In vivo versus in vitro produced bovine ova: similarities and differences relevant for practication application.Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1998, v. 38. 579-594
2. Fair T. et al. Ultrastructure of bovine blastocysts following cryopreservation: effect of method of blastocyst production. Mol Reprod.Dev. 2001. v. 58. 186-195
3. Pollard, J.W.; Leibo, S.P. Chiling sensitivity of mammalian embryos.Theriogenology. 1994. v. 41. 101-106.
4. Massip, A et.al. A. Morphology and biochemistry of in vitro-produced bovine embryos: implications for their cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod., v. 10. 3004.
5. Rieger D, Pollard JW, Leibo SP. The effect of cryopreservation on the metabolic activity of in vitro produced cattle blastocyst.Cryobiology. 1993. 30. 631.
6. Partridge RJ.et.al. Glucose uptake and lactate production by single frozen-thawed bovine embryos produced in vivo or by in vitro fertilisation. J Reprod. Fert. 1995. 13. 41.
7. Khurana NK, Niemann H. Effects of cryopreservation on glucose metabolism and survival of bovine morulae and blastocysts derived in vitro or in vivo. Theriogenology. 2000. 54. 313-326.
8. Rizos D. et.al. Consequences of bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization or early embryo development in vitro versus in vivo: implications for blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2002. 61. 234-248.
9. Rizos D. et. al. Analysis of differential messenger RNA expression between bovine blastocysts produced in different culture systems: implications for blastocyst quality. Biol Reprod 2002. 66. 589-95.
10. Gordon. I. Laboratory production of cattle embryos. 2003.
11. Imai K. et. al. Different factors affect developmental competence and cryotolerance in in vitro produced bovine embryos. 2002. 64 (10). 887-891.
12. Sang-Rae Cho. Enhanced Cryosurvival of Bovine Blastocysts Produced in Vitro in Serum-Free Medium Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2002 V. 19 (10). 487-492
13. Pereira R.M. et.al. Post-thawing resistance of bovine embryos is improved by trans-10 cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). 15th Inter.Congress on animal Reprod. 8-12 Aug. 2004. v. 2. 538.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Сингина Г.Н., Эрнст Л.К., Тарадайник Т.Е. ЗАМОРАЖИВАНИЕ ЭМБРИОНОВ КРУПНОГО РОГАТОГО СКОТА ПОЛУЧЕННЫХ IN VITRO. Ветеринарная патология. 2007;(4):223-225.