Preview

Russian Journal of Veterinary Pathology

Advanced search

DAT Knockout Rat Models: Dopamine Dysfunction, Epigenetic Mechanisms, and Approaches to Gene Therapy: A Literature Review

https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-4826-2026-25-2-14-24

EDN: TYPQWH

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

Introduction. Dopamine transporter gene knockout (DAT-KO) animal model is a valuable experimental tool for studying the pathophysiology of diseases associated with dopamine dysfunction, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease. The aim of the present review is to systematize the scientific data on using the DAT-KO rat models for studying dopaminergic dysfunction, epigenetic mechanisms, and gene therapy approaches.
Materials and Methods. Literary sources were searched for in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar scientific citation databases. The original studies (n=49) on the structure and function of DAT, knockout models, epigenetic mechanisms, and gene therapy published from 1991 to 2025 in English language only were included into the review. The results have been presented in a PRISMA flow chart and in the illustrations.
Results. DAT knockout rat models exhibit a 5–7-fold increase of extracellular dopamine level, hyperactivity and structural changes in the basal ganglia, which indicates dopamine dysfunction. Homozygous knockout animals are found to completely lack functional DAT protein, whereas animals with heterozygous knockout retain approximately half of its function and exhibit intermediate phenotypes. Epigenetic regulation of SLC6A3 gene expression is mediated by DNA methylation, histone modifications (including H3K9/K14 acetylation and H3K27 methylation) and microRNA modifications. Moreover, the DAT promoter remains hypomethylated during postnatal ontogenesis in rats, resulting in its age-related expression increase. Gene therapy using viral vectors has demonstrated the potential to restore DAT function.
Discussion and Conclusion. The DAT-KO rat models reliably reproduce the key neurochemical and morphological features of dopaminergic dysfunction. However, the picture seems much incomplete due to the fragmentary character of data on the dynamics of epigenetic regulation of dopamine transporter expression during disease progression and insufficient evidence base on dose-dependent effects and long-term safety of gene therapy. The epigenetic mechanisms open the new tracks for biomarker search and personalization of therapy. Gene therapy using adeno-associated viral and lentiviral vectors demonstrates the potential to restore DAT function in the preclinical models, however, further clarification on dosedependent effects and minimization of the immune response is required. The integration of epigenetic markers into the clinical protocols, development of combinatory strategies, and validation of the DAT-KO models for comorbid conditions continue to be the promising tracks for further research.

For citations:


Khakimov A.R., Lebedeva A.I., Musina L.A., Khismatullina Z.R. DAT Knockout Rat Models: Dopamine Dysfunction, Epigenetic Mechanisms, and Approaches to Gene Therapy: A Literature Review. Russian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 2026;25(2):14-24. https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-4826-2026-25-2-14-24. EDN: TYPQWH

Introduction. Rats and mice with knockout of dopamine transporter (DAT) protein encoded by SLC6A3 gene, represent a valuable experimental DAT-KO model for studying the pathophysiology of diseases associated with dopamine dysfunction. The dopamine transporter plays a key role in regulation of the dopaminergic neurotransmission, ensuring reuptake of dopamine from the synaptic cleft into presynaptic neurons, which controls the intensity and duration of signals on dopamine receptors [1][2]. DAT is expressed predominantly in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area, with the highest degree of expression in the striatum and nucleus accumbens, where it regulates up to 80% of dopaminergic signaling [1]. In the prefrontal cortex, crusial for higher cognitive control and social interactions, DAT, in conjunction with the norepinephrine transporter, modulates dopamine activity influencing social behavior [2][3]. Dysregulation in DAT-mediated dopamine homeostasis is associated with depression, bipolar disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease. Due to DAT being a target for psychostimulants such as cocaine and methylphenidate, it is associated with disorders caused by the use of psychoactive substances [1][4].

The DAT-KO animal model is characterized by a complete absence of functional protein, which induces a hyperdopaminergic condition characterised by a 5–7-fold increase of extracellular dopamine level and a decrease in presynaptic dopamine [5]. This results in hyperactivity, motor stereotypies, cognitive deficits and disorders of diminished motivation, as well as in neuroanatomical changes including reduced striatal volume, increased volume of prefrontal cortex and cerebellum, decreased GABAergic interneuron density and dysfunctions in the serotonergic system [2][4][6]. With regard to physiology, DAT-KO rats exhibit reduction of body weight and impaired motor coordination, making the model relevant for studying ADHD and schizophrenia [1][2]. Heterozygous DAT-KO rats with partial reduction in DAT activity, also exhibit patterns of altered behavior. Therefore, even partial loss of DAT function can cause significant neurochemical and behavioral changes [6].

The aim of the present review is to systematize scientific data on using the DAT knockout (DAT-KO) rat models for studying the dopamine dysregulation, epigenetic mechanisms, and gene therapy approaches.

Materials and Methods. Search for literature was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar science citation databases by the keywords: dopamine transporter, DAT-KO, SLC6A3, dopamine dysregulation, epigenetic regulation, gene therapy, dopamine signaling, DAT knockout rats, DAT knockout mice, neurotransmitter transporters. The latest search was performed on October 5, 2025. The following publications were included in the analysis: the original studies, reviews, and meta-analyses in the English language only, published from 1991 to 2025. The sample included publications (n=49) containing data on: dopamine dysregulation (neurochemical and behavioral phenotypes) in DAT-KO rat models; epigenetic mechanisms of dopamine transporter regulation; gene therapy approaches to DAT deficiency using viral vectors. The results have been systematized and presented in the PRISMA flow chart and in the figures.

Research Results

Selection of references. As a result of the search across all scientific citation databases and other sources, 253 publications were found. After removal of 43 duplicates, 210 articles were selected for further analysis. After screening titles and abstracts, 115 articles were excluded. Potentially eligible full texts (n=95) were uploaded to cloud storage and reviewed by a wide range of experts to assess their relevance. At this stage, another 46 publications were excluded as they did not contain information on methodology, results, or interpretation thereof in the context of dopaminergic dysfunction. Thus, 49 articles were eventually selected to undergo the review. A summary of the literary sources’ verification process for inclusion into the review is presented in the PRISMA flowchart (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Flow chart for selecting the publications in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines

The SLC6A3 gene and its role in dopamine dysfunction. The SLC6A3 gene encoding DAT belongs to the family of Na⁺- and Cl⁻-dependent neurotransmitter transporters (Fig. 2). In humans, it is localized on the chromosome 5p15.33 and covers approximately 52.5 kbp, including 15 coding exons [7][8]. The DAT protein consists of 620 amino acids, has a molecular mass of approximately 69 kDa, and includes 12 transmembrane domains. The N-terminus and C-terminus are oriented toward the cytoplasm, and a large extracellular loop with N-glycosylation sites is located between the third and fourth domains [9].

Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the human SLC6A3 gene sequence. Dark vertical blocks represent exons (1–15), with introns located between them. The positions of polymorphic markers (rs-numbers) are indicated along the gene sequence. The grey arrow indicates the 5'-untranslated region (5'UTR), and the black arrow indicates the 3'-untranslated region (3'UTR). The scale bar at the top corresponds to the gene localization on the chromosome [14]

In mice, the SLC6A3 gene is localized on chromosome 13 and has a highly conserved gene sequence: the gene also consists of 15 exons, and the boundaries of the intron-exon junctions in the coding regions are completely identical to those in humans [10]. The size of the mouse gene is significantly smaller—approximately 24.5 kbp—and the nucleotide sequences are 85% identic with that of human DAT (amino acid sequences are 93% identic). However, mice lack the Variable Number Tandem Repeat (VNTR) in the 3'-untranslated region characteristic of humans, and their full-length mRNA is 10% shorter [10][11].

The rat SLC6A3 gene also contains 15 exons, and its cDNA was cloned and sequenced in the early 1990s [12][13]. The amino acid sequence of rat DAT exhibits 97% identity with the human protein within the transmembrane domains and 87% — in the extramembrane regions [11]. The rat protein, like the mouse protein, consists of 619 amino acids (one less than the human protein due to the absence of the CAG codon encoding glycine at position 198) and has a molecular mass of approximately 69 kDa [11].

The main function of DAT is the Na⁺- and Cl⁻-dependent reuptake of dopamine from the synaptic cleft back to the presynaptic terminal (Fig. 3). It is less efficient in transporting norepinephrine [15][16]. The highest expression is observed in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area [1], whereas the highest protein density is observed in axonal terminals of the striatum and nucleus accumbens [17][18]. In the prefrontal cortex, the amount of DAT is significantly lower, and its functions are partially compensated by the norepinephrine transporter [19].

Fig. 3. Topological structure of DAT. Rectangles represent transmembrane domains (1–12) connected by intracellular (ICL) and extracellular (ECL) loops. The  N-terminus and C-terminus are located in the cytoplasm. Orange-colour spheres correspond to Na⁺ ions, and the green-and-white model corresponds to the substrate molecule in the binding site. Two domains with an inverted symmetry axis form the substrate binding site [15].

The functional activity of the protein is regulated by post-translational modifications. Phosphorylation of serine residues in the C-terminus affects intracellular transport and the rate of dopamine reuptake [20]. Cysteine palmitoylation in the second and fifth transmembrane domains promotes oligomer formation [21]. Lysine ubiquitination in the C-terminus determines the rate of protein degradation [22], and N-glycosylation of asparagines in the extracellular loop stabilizes the structure of DAT and regulates its expression on the membrane [23].

Genetic variants of SLC6A3 include a 40-bp VNTR polymorphism in the 3'-untranslated region. The number of repeats can vary from three to eleven, with the most common allele having ten repeats, occurring in approximately 70% of the population [24][25]. Shorter variants, such as the 9R allele, are associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia, as well as with the development of cocaine and alcohol dependences. The 10R allele, on the contrary, is more often associated with Parkinson’s disease and ADHD, as well as a lower susceptibility to nicotine dependence [8].

Alongside, the pathogenic mutations, including missense substitutions (e.g., p.Leu368GIn) and splicing abnormalities (c.1269+1G→A), which lead to the development of DAT deficiency syndrome, also known as infantile parkinsonism-dystonia 1, were found to be described [26]. This condition is characterized by a complete loss of protein function and pronounced hyperdopaminergia [26][27]. The gene damage tolerance assessment (GDI=0.90) indicates its moderate sensitivity to mutations [28]. Among the known protein partners of DAT, the following ones have been described: PRKCABP and TGFB1I1 [29], involved in the regulation of phosphorylation; SYNGR3, binding to the N-terminus [30]; and TOR1A, affecting intracellular localization [31].

Animal models with knockout of DAT-encoding gene. The homology between human SLC6A3 and its rat ortholog is high. The coding sequence of nucleotide sequence is approximately 85% convergent, and the amino acid sequence of DAT is 92% convergent [32]. This proximity ensures preservation of key structural and functional properties of the protein across species. Therefore, gene knockout in rats replicates the key manifestations of DAT deficiency in humans, including hyperdopaminergia and motor impairments. Thus, the DAT-KO rats represent the robust models for studying the pathogenetic mechanisms associated with DAT dysfunction.

The study of the physiological role of DAT began with the creation of the first animal models with the respective gene being knocked out. Among the first such models were DAT knockout mice genetically engineered by homologous recombination in vivo. To construct a targeting vector, dopamine transporter cDNA was used: a 2.0 kbp region including exons 6–8 was replaced with the PGK-Neo cassette. The vector was administered into embryonic stem cells by electroporation, and homologous recombinants were selected by double selection and confirmed by Southern blotting. Embryonic cells with correct integration were used to engineer the chimeric individuals, from which the heterozygous DAT+/– and homozygous DAT−/− mice were reared—the first experimental models with DAT deficiency [33].

Rat SLC6A3 knockout was obtained using targeted mutagenesis. This model was first engineered in 2018 in Wistar-Han rats using the “zinc fingers” method. Removal of five base pairs in the second exon resulted in the premature formation of a stop codon and the absence of DAT mRNA in the striatum [5].

In 2022, an alternative Sprague-Dawley rat strain was engineered with the identical mutation obtained by CRISPR/Cas9 method. In homozygous animals the protein was completely absent, extracellular dopamine level was 5–7 times higher, the tyrosine hydroxylase expression was observed to increase in the substantia nigra, whereas normal regulation of other genes of dopamine system was maintained [34]. Heterozygous animals preserved approximately half of the DAT function and exhibited intermediate behavioral phenotypes [35].

Epigenetic mechanisms of dopamine transporter gene regulation. Expression is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and activity of non-coding RNAs [36]. These processes determine the level of transcription in dopaminergic neurons and thereby influence dopamine reuptake and DAT endocytosis. Disruptions in these mechanisms are likely to be the factors of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disease pathogeneses.

DNA methylation is performed by DNA methyltransferase enzymes and usually reduces promoter function due to the incorporation of 5-methylcytosine into CpG islands [37]. In the brains of patients with Parkinson’s disease, hypermethylation of the SLC6A3 gene promoter has been observed, which leads to reduced DAT expression and reduced efficiency of its endocytosis, increasing dopamine deficiency. The use of demethylating agents, such as 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine, fosters the restoration of expression and stimulates the differentiation of dopaminergic neurons [36]. In the norm, in rats in early postnatal development, DAT promoter remains hypomethylated, which ensures an age-related increase of mRNA levels in the midbrain and reflects the dynamics of the dopaminergic system maturation [38].

Histone modifications also regulate DNA accessibility for transcription factors. Acetylation of H3K9/K14 residues increases significantly by 56th postnatal day, which is accompanied by an increase in DAT mRNA levels in the midbrain and striatum. A 71.3% decrease in Dnmt1 expression and 84.3% decrease in Dnmt3a expression by 56th postnatal day are accompanied by an increase in DAT level. During the same period, the Nurr1 and Pitx3 transcription factors enhance binding to the gene promoter region, with 6- and 8-fold increase of activity, respectively. These interactions with epigenetic markers ensure age-related regulation of DAT expression [38]. Histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 supress the transcription, whereas their inhibitors, such as vorinostat, increase acetylation and enhance protein endocytosis [36]. H3K27 methylation by EZH2 inhibits DAT expression in Parkinson’s disease and reduces the levels of genes involved in endocytosis, such as clathrin and dynamin. Changes in methylation levels of H3K4 and H3K27 histones in this disease are associated with activation of neuroinflammation and death of neurons [39].

MicroRNAs and long non-coding RNAs regulate post-transcriptional DAT expression. An additional level of control is provided by mRNA modifications, such as N6-methyladenine. These modifications determine the stability and efficiency of mRNA translation and influence endocytosis via signaling pathways mediated by protein kinase C and dopamine D2 receptors [36][40]. Demethylases reduce DAT expression and foster α-synuclein accumulation in Parkinson’s disease. Moreover, RNA editing by ADAR enzymes and pseudouridylation affect the function of endocytic proteins and, consequently, dopamine reuptake processes [36].

Disruption of these mechanisms is likely to be associated with ADHD, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease. Whereas, according to some data, the epigenetic inhibitors, such as GSK126 and STM2457, may be considered as potential therapeutic agents [36][41][42].

Gene therapy for DAT deficiency. Research into gene therapy for DAT deficiency has begun relatively recently. Therapy is based on the administration of a functional copy of the SLC6A3 gene using viral vectors—mostly adeno-associated viruses (AAV) and lentiviruses (LV) [26].

Administration of AAV2 or AAV9 with the synapsin promoter into the substantia nigra or intraventricularly ensures expression of human DAT in dopaminergic neurons, followed by protein transport to the striatum. During experiments in DAT-KO mice, the therapy demonstrated distinct dose dependence: administration of 2×10¹⁰ vg per mouse ensured complete restoration of motor function, normalized the descent time along the vertical pole and other motor activity indices, and resulted in 100% survival by 12th week. Similar results were obtained after administration of AAV9 on 0 postnatal day. However, excess of the therapeutic dose by an order of magnitude caused toxicity with tremor and bradykinesia in half of the animals [43].

In adult mice, administration of AAV2 or AAV2/10 with different constructs (hSyn1-hDAT, TH-iCre/CMV-DIO-mDAT) also resulted in dose-dependent recovery: walking distance and time spent in the central zone during the open field test were observed to normalize, motor skills in the vertical pole test — to improve, gait parameters — to restore and hyperlocomotion — to reduce [44].

Combinatory approaches to DAT deficiency gene therapy involve the use of multiple vectors to ensure selective expression in dopaminergic neurons or the combination of viral delivery with pharmacological agents. In the DAT-KO mouse models, combined delivery of two AAV vectors was performed: AAV2/10 packaged with Cre-recombinase under the control of the tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) promoter and AAV2/10 packaged with Cre-dependent rat DAT expression cassette were administered into the substantia nigra. This approach ensured DAT expression only in TH-positive neurons. By 48th day after injection, a decrease in hyperlocomotion in the open field test, normalization of performance in the vertical pole test, and restoration of gait parameters were observed. Biochemical analysis showed partial restoration of dopamine uptake and normalization of the ratio of metabolites of the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems [44].

Similar therapy with a dual-AAV-vector-system administered to adult mice confirmed reaching the stable effect. Tyrosine hydroxylase expression was maintained without undesirable activation in other structures, such as the locus coeruleus [44][45].

Lentiviral vectors (LV) are used in DAT deficiency gene therapy primarily in in vitro models based on iPSCs differentiated into midbrain dopaminergic neurons. In such systems, LV is used to correct mutations in the target gene that cause loss of DAT function. LV transduction restores dopamine uptake, reduces apoptosis, and increases the survival of TH-positive cells. The combination of LVs with an Hsp70 protein inhibitor enhances the effect, increasing dopamine uptake by 50–100% and reducing apoptosis to 20–30% of the control level. However, for some mutations, the effect is determined predominantly by viral transduction [43]. Therapy with LV is less commonly used in in vivo models, including DAT-KO mice, but LVs demonstrate the potential for selective expression in dopaminergic neurons and restoration of motor function [45].

Compared to AAV systems, lentiviral vectors provide more stable integration into the host genome but are associated with a risk of insertional mutagenesis, which limits their clinical application [46]. At the same time, analysis of available data shows that the main track of research is targeted at AAV due to their low immunogenicity and high efficacy of certain serotypes (AAV2, AAV5, AAV8, AAV9) for the central nervous system [47][48]. Studies using other viral platforms (in particular, adenovirus or herpesvirus) for the correction of DAT deficiency are not available yet, which highlights the limitations of the current experimental database.

Discussion and Conclusion. A significant amount of data on studying the dopamine dysfunction, epigenetic mechanisms, and gene therapy approaches in the DAT-KO rat models is accumulated in the scientific literature and has been systematized by the authors. However, the completeness of this dataset is limited by several factors: homozygous models are used quite oftener in research than the heterozygous ones, which limits the understanding of the full range of consequences of partial DAT dysfunction. Data on the dynamics in epigenetic regulation of the dopamine transporter remain fragmented [32][34], and preclinical gene therapy studies are not supported by a sufficient number of studies on long-term safety [39][42].

The literature review has shown that homozygous DAT gene knockout models can replicate certain aspects of dopaminergic transmission dysregulation [1][5]. The complete absence of the transporter functions represents an extreme form of pathology, whereas heterozygous specimens exhibit intermediate phenotypic manifestations, and therefore their parallel study is increasingly valuable.

In addition, neuroanatomical and behavioral changes in knockout models may reflect both direct consequences of DAT deficiency and secondary conditions in other neurotransmitter networks [49]. Therefore, multimodal approaches are required to separate primary and secondary effects: high-field MRI for quantitative morphometry, targeted transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to identify cascades of compensatory changes, and time-related assessment of phenotypes at different ages. Epigenetic data on SLC6A3 regulation provide an important but still fragmentary addition to the understanding of dopaminergic dysfunction. Single studies indicate hypermethylation of the SLC6A3 promoter in Parkinson’s disease and age-dependent changes in histone methylation and modifications in rodent models [38][39]. However, these scattered data do not allow building a comprehensive picture, since this requires establishing an exact correspondence between epigenetic markers, DAT expression and the clinical picture.

At the same time, the prospects for therapeutic correction of DAT deficiency appear encouraging. AAV-mediated delivery of SLC6A3 has shown dose-dependent restoration of motor parameters in animal models [43][44][45]. However, the use of AAV vectors has certain difficulties due to a narrow therapeutic index in terms of time and dose [46], which requires precision of the parameters of administration and spatiotemporal control of transgene expression.

Alongside, two-vector approaches ensuring selective expression in TH neurons and LV strategies for in vitro correction in iPSCs demonstrate functional efficacy [43]. But LV vectors are a priori less safe compared to AAV [48]. Therefore, research priority should be given to optimising targeting, control of expression levels and long-term monitoring of side effects.

Thus, the SLC6A3 gene knockout rat model represents a valuable experimental model for studying the pathophysiology of dopaminergic dysfunctions. Its high homology to the human SLC6A3 gene ensures the replicability of key phenotypes, including hyperdopaminergia, motor and cognitive disorders, and makes it relevant for studying ADHD, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and DAT deficiency syndrome.

Advanced gene therapy strategies based on AAV and LV vectors demonstrate high efficacy in restoring DAT function and correcting motor and behavioral disorders in experimental models. However, the specific nature of gene therapy using viral vectors, particularly the narrow therapeutic dose range and the need to prevent side effects, as well as the limited available data, emphasise the importance of further research.

References

1. Savchenko A, Targa G, Fesenko Z, Leo D, Gainetdinov RR, Sukhanov I. Dopamine Transporter Deficient Rodents: Perspectives and Limitations for Neuroscience. Biomolecules. 2023;13(5):806. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13050806

2. Puzzo C, Festucci F, Curcio G, Gigantesco A, Adriani W. Exploring Transgenerational Inheritance in Epigenotypes of DAT Heterozygous Rats: Circadian Anomalies and Attentional Vulnerability. Behavioural Brain Research. 2024;464:114921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114921

3. Petrelli F, Dallérac G, Pucci L, Calì C, Zehnder T, Sultan S, et al. Dysfunction of Homeostatic Control of Dopamine by Astrocytes in the Developing Prefrontal Cortex Leads to Cognitive Impairments. Molecular Psychiatry. 2020;25(4):732–749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0226-y

4. Adinolfi A, Zelli S, Leo D, Carbone C, Mus L, Illiano P, et al. Behavioral Characterization of DAT-KO Rats and Evidence of Asocial-Like Phenotypes in DAT-HET Rats: The Potential Involvement of Norepinephrine System. Behav-ioural Brain Research. 2019;359:516–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.11.028

5. Leo D, Sukhanov I, Zoratto F, Illiano P, Caffino L, Sanna F, et al. Pronounced Hyperactivity, Cognitive Dysfunc-tions, and BDNF Dysregulation in Dopamine Transporter Knock-out Rats. Journal of Neuroscience. 2018;38(8):1959–1972. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1931-17.2018

6. Cinque S, Zoratto F, Poleggi A, Leo D, Cerniglia L, Cimino S, et al. Behavioral Phenotyping of Dopamine Trans-porter Knockout Rats: Compulsive Traits, Motor Stereotypies, and Anhedonia. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2018;9:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00043

7. Apsley AT, Domico ER, Verbiest MA, Brogan CA, Buck ER, Burich AJ, et al. A Novel Hypervariable Variable Number Tandem Repeat in the Dopamine Transporter Gene (SLC6A3). Life Science Alliance. 2023;6(4):e202201677. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202201677

8. Reith MEA, Kortagere S, Wiers CE, Sun Hui, Kurian MA, Galli A, et al. The Dopamine Transporter Gene SLC6A3: Multidisease Risks. Molecular Psychiatry. 2022;27(2):1031–1046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01341-5

9. Nguyen H, Cheng MH, Lee JY, Aggarwal S, Mortensen OV, Bahar I. Allosteric Modulation of Serotonin and Dopamine Transporters: New Insights from Computations and Experiments. Current Research in Physiology. 2024;7:100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crphys.2024.100125

10. Donovan DM, Vandenbergh DJ, Perry MP, Bird GS, Ingersoll R, Nanthakumar E, et al. Human and Mouse Do-pamine Transporter Genes: Conservation of 5′-Flanking Sequence Elements and Gene Structures. Molecular Brain Re-search. 1995;30(2):327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-328x(95)00018-n

11. Vandenbergh DJ, Persico AM, Uhl GR. A Human Dopamine Transporter cDNA Predicts Reduced Glycosylation, Displays a Novel Repetitive Element and Provides Racially-Dimorphic TaqI RFLPs. Molecular Brain Research. 1992;15(1–2):161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-328x(92)90165-8

12. Shimada S, Kitayama S, Lin CL, Patel A, Nanthakumar E, Gregor P, et al. Cloning and Expression of a Cocaine-Sensitive Dopamine Transporter Complementary DNA. Science. 1991;254(5031):576-578. https://doi.org/10.1126/sci-ence.1948034

13. Kilty JE, Lorang D, Amara SG. Cloning and Expression of a Cocaine-Sensitive Rat Dopamine Transporter. Sci-ence. 1991;254(5031):578–579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1948035

14. Koijam AS, Hijam AC, Singh AS, Jaiswal P, Mukhopadhyay K, Rajamma U, et al. Association of Dopamine Transporter Gene with Heroin Dependence in an Indian Subpopulation from Manipur. Journal of Molecular Neurosci-ence. 2021;71(1):122-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-020-01633-5

15. Nepal B, Das S, Reith ME, Kortagere S. Overview of the Structure and Function of the Dopamine Transporter and Its Protein Interactions. Frontiers in Physiology. 2023;14:1150355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1150355

16. Pidathala S, Mallela AK, Joseph D, Penmatsa A. Structural Basis of Norepinephrine Recognition and Transport Inhibition in Neurotransmitter Transporters. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1):2199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22385-9

17. Nirenberg MJ, Chan J, Pohorille A, Vaughan RA, Uhl GR, Kuhar MJ, et al. The Dopamine Transporter: Compar-ative Ultrastructure of Dopaminergic Axons in Limbic and Motor Compartments of the Nucleus Accumbens. Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17(18):6899–6907. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-18-06899.1997

18. Basso V, Döbrössy MD, Thompson LH, Kirik D, Fuller HR, Gates MA. State of the Art in Sub-Phenotyping Midbrain Dopamine Neurons. Biology. 2024;13(9):690. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090690

19. Sugimoto A, Suzuki Y, Yoshinaga K, Orime N, Hayashi T, Egawa J, et al. Influence of Atomoxetine on Relation-ship Between ADHD Symptoms and Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Task Execution in Adult Patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2021;15:755025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.755025

20. Granas C, Ferrer J, Loland CJ, Javitch JA, Gether U. N-Terminal Truncation of the Dopamine Transporter Abol-ishes Phorbol Ester- and Substance P Receptor-Stimulated Phosphorylation without Impairing Transporter Internaliza-tion. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(7):4990–5000. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205058200

21. Zeppelin T, Pedersen KB, Berglund NA, Periole X, Schiøtt B. Effect of Palmitoylation on the Dimer Formation of the Human Dopamine Transporter. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):4164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83374-y

22. Daniels GM, Amara SG. Regulated Trafficking of the Human Dopamine Transporter: Clathrin-Mediated Inter-nalization and Lysosomal Degradation in Response to Phorbol Esters. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(50):35794-35801. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.50.35794

23. Afonso-Oramas D, Cruz-Muros I, de la Rosa DA, Abreu P, Giráldez T, Castro-Hernández J, et al. Dopamine Transporter Glycosylation Correlates with the Vulnerability of Midbrain Dopaminergic Cells in Parkinson’s Disease. Neurobiology of Disease. 2009;36(3):494–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2009.09.002

24. Olasore HS, Osuntoki AA, Magbagbeola OA, Awesu AB, Olashore AA. Association of Dopamine Transporter Gene (DAT1) 40 bp 3' UTR VNTR Polymorphism (rs28363170) and Cannabis Use Disorder. Substance Use: Research and Treatment. 2023;17:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231163696

25. Zeng Q, Ning F, Gu S, Zeng Q, Chen R, Peng L, et al. The 10-Repeat 3'-UTR VNTR Polymorphism in the SLC6A3 Gene May Confer Protection against Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Genetics. 2021;12:789112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.789112

26. Ng J, Barral S, Waddington SN, Kurian MA. Dopamine Transporter Deficiency Syndrome (DTDS): Expanding the Clinical Phenotype and Precision Medicine Approaches. Cells. 2023;12(13):1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131737

27. Madduluri B, Garapati D, Yareeda S. Dopamine Transporter Deficiency Syndrome: A Rare Case of Infantile-Onset Dystonia-Parkinsonism. Journal of Movement Disorders. 2025;18(3):280–282. https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.25057

28. Itan Yuval, Shang Lei, Boisson B, Patin E, Bolze A, Moncada-Vélez M, et al. The Human Gene Damage Index as a Gene-Level Approach to Prioritizing Exome Variants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112(44):13615-13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518646112

29. Torres GE, Yao WD, Mohn AR, Quan H, Kim KM, Levey AI, et al. Functional Interaction between Monoamine Plasma Membrane Transporters and the Synaptic PDZ Domain-Containing Protein PICK1. Neuron. 2001;30(1):121–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00267-7

30. Egaña LA, Cuevas RA, Baust TB, Parra LA, Leak RK, Hochendoner S, et al. Physical and Functional Interaction between the Dopamine Transporter and the Synaptic Vesicle Protein Synaptogyrin-3. Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29(14):4592-4604. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4559-08.2009

31. Torres GE, Sweeney AL, Beaulieu JM, Shashidharan P, Caron MG. Effect of TorsinA on Membrane Proteins Reveals a Loss of Function and a Dominant-Negative Phenotype of the Dystonia-Associated DeltaE-TorsinA Mutant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(44):15650–15655. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308088101

32. Giros B, el Mestikawy S, Godinot N, Zheng K, Han H, Yang-Feng T, et al. Cloning, Pharmacological Character-ization, and Chromosome Assignment of the Human Dopamine Transporter. Molecular Pharmacology. 1992;42(3):383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-895X(25)08925-4

33. Kurzina NP, Volnova AB, Aristova IY, Gainetdinov RR. A New Paradigm for Training Hyperactive Dopamine Transporter Knockout Rats: Influence of Novel Stimuli on Object Recognition. Frontier in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2021;15:654469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.654469

34. Lloyd JT, Yee AG, Kalligappa PK, Jabed A, Cheung PY, Todd KL, et al. Dopamine Dysregulation and Altered Responses to Drugs Affecting Dopaminergic Transmission in a New Dopamine Transporter Knockout (DAT-KO) Rat Model. Neuroscience. 2022;491:43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.03.019

35. Vaganova AN, Fesenko ZS, Volnova AB, Gainetdinov RR. Stable Dopamine-Signaling mRNA Co-Expression in the Substantia Nigra is Deregulated in Pathological Conditions, but Not in Dopamine Transporter Knockout Rats. Bio-molecules. 2025;15(8):1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15081117

36. Liang Z, Liu W, Cao M, Cui J, Lan J, Ding Y, et al. Epigenetic Regulation-Mediated Disorders in Dopamine Transporter Endocytosis: A Novel Mechanism for the Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease. Theranostics. 2025;15(6):2250–2278. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.107436

37. Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA Methylation and Its Basic Function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(1):23–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.112

38. Green AL, Eid A, Zhan L, Zarbl H, Guo GL, Richardson JR. Epigenetic Regulation of the Ontogenic Expression of the Dopamine Transporter. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019;10:1099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01099

39. Song H, Chen J, Huang J, Sun P, Liu Y, Xu L, et al. Epigenetic Modification in Parkinson’s Disease. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2023;11:1123621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1123621

40. Jiang X, Liu B, Nie Z, Duan L, Xiong Q, Jin Z, et al. The Role of M6a Modification in the Biological Functions and Diseases. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2021;6(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00450-x

41. Yankova E, Blackaby W, Albertella M, Rak J, De Braekeleer E, Tsagkogeorga G, et al. Small-Molecule Inhibition of METTL3 as a Strategy against Myeloid Leukaemia. Nature. 2021;593:597–601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03536-w

42. Li Y, Gan Y, Liu J, Li J, Zhou Z, Tian R, et al. Downregulation of MEIS1 Mediated by ELFN1-AS1/EZH2/DNMT3a Axis Promotes Tumorigenesis and Oxaliplatin Resistance in Colorectal Cancer. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2022;7(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00902-6

43. Ng J, Barral S, De La Fuente Barrigon C, Lignani G, Erdem FA, Wallings R, et al. Gene Therapy Restores Dopa-mine Transporter Expression and Ameliorates Pathology in iPSC and Mouse Models of Infantile Parkinsonism. Science Translational Medicine. 2021;13(594):eaaw1564. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw1564

44. Illiano P, Bass CE, Fichera L, Mus L, Budygin EA, Sotnikova TD, et al. Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus-Mediated Rescue of Function in a Mouse Model of Dopamine Transporter Deficiency Syndrome. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:46280. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46280

45. Ng J, Barral S, Waddington SN, Kurian MA. Gene Therapy for Dopamine Dyshomeostasis: From Parkinson’s to Primary Neurotransmitter Diseases. Movement Disorders. 2023;38(6):924–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.29416

46. Escors D, Breckpot K. Lentiviral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Their Current Status and Future Potential. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis. 2010;58(2):107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-010-0063-4

47. Xu L, Yao S, Ding YE, Xie M, Feng D, Sha P. Designing and Optimizing AAV-Mediated Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Bench to Bedside. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2024;22(1):866. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05661-2

48. Wang Y, Mu S, Liu F. Viral Vectors in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Immune Responses and Therapeutic Appli-cations. Frontiers in Neurology. 2025;16:1603125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1603125

49. Belskaya A, Kurzina N, Savchenko A, Sukhanov I, Gromova A, Gainetdinov RR. Rats Lacking the Dopamine Transporter Display Inflexibility in Innate and Learned Behavior. Biomedicines. 2024;12(6):1270. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12061270


About the Authors

A. R. Khakimov
Russian Eye and Plastic Surgery Center of Bashkir State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Albert R. Khakimov, Junior Research Associate of the Morphology Research Department

67/1, R. Zorge Str., Ufa, 450075



A. I. Lebedeva
Russian Eye and Plastic Surgery Center of Bashkir State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Anna I. Lebedeva, Dr.Sci. (Biology), Lead Research Associate, Head of the Morphology Research Department

67/1, R. Zorge Str., Ufa, 450075



L. A. Musina
Russian Eye and Plastic Surgery Center of Bashkir State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Lyalya A. Musina, Dr.Sci. (Biology), Lead Research Associate of the Morphology Research Department

67/1, R. Zorge Str., Ufa, 450075



Z. R. Khismatullina
Ufa University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation

Zukhra R. Khismatullina, Dr.Sci.(Biology), Professor of the Department of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Physiology

32, Zaki Validi Str., Ufa, 450008



Review

For citations:


Khakimov A.R., Lebedeva A.I., Musina L.A., Khismatullina Z.R. DAT Knockout Rat Models: Dopamine Dysfunction, Epigenetic Mechanisms, and Approaches to Gene Therapy: A Literature Review. Russian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 2026;25(2):14-24. https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-4826-2026-25-2-14-24. EDN: TYPQWH

Views: 344

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-4826 (Online)